Now we come to the preface of this theory. This shortly summarises the chat conversation I had with santosh in the previous entry. The beginning is the crucial part in the preface. We have to start somewhere and we start with infinity.
All the theories out there which explain they physical and the non-physical universe is nothing but intelligent speculation. Theories are built, verified against all the evidence that can be possibly gathered, and even if one evidence goes against the theory, the theory has to be rubbished.
For explaining our theory in simple terms we have to take hold of the concept called infinity. Inifinity is just a concept, something which can be defined as unending. An anology is about how I think the universe is. Say galaxies after galaxies after galaxies and it goes on and on and on. Now that is a vague way that we can call infinity. But that is a limitation of the mind. Mind struggles to visualise infinity and thats the limit of the mind, after which it cannot go.
To use Santosh’s terminology, Those who ask about infinity can be satisfied only with the statement ” infinity is the boundary of mind, we think see imagine and speculate within it”. Now mathematics does not seem to go to that area at all. As Santosh says, mathematics have done a wonderful thing they kept all analysis within negative and positive infinity, excluding the two.
Now we introduce something called phi. This is something beyond the mind, that can be only understood, we cannot imagine this. Now the problem is that we are entering a stage of philosophy, because science is nothing but natural philosophy has no options here other than to merge at level beyond the mind. The problem with phi is that, we cannot define it, as it will again bring it down to the level of the imaginable realm. So we keep the phi as something that is the beginning. Now as per this theory that is not true also, as beyond the phi level, lies the zhy or the field of pure awareness. Ok, we keep the things on hold here, as this sounds fiction rather than science. But this has to be the foundation of our theory as every other information is built upon this.
To put this in simple terms, we need to think of something like a point. The very concept of a point is very hard to comprehend. The problem begins when we think about a point, there can be no dimensions and smaller than the smallest. Now here again we are limited to explain a point. Now, when we dont know apoint, we cannot talk abt a line, and we cannot know anything about motion. Now for that again we need to come to something called dimension. We cannot even say how a particle moves from one point to another as in between it involves passing through infinite number of points, at infinite infinitesimals of time.
We only see the outer effect and cannot define even the concept of an adjacent point. There is no such point, even then we see particles traversing thru all ‘ adjacent’ points to reach another point. Once we come to the limitation that we have that Santosh introduces the concept of Zhy.
To avoid all images mind makes by relating to what it knows, to go and make standpoint out side the boundary of mind – in the intellectual extension – and to see the world as it could have been created or so from there, and to make a theory. Because, from that layer infinity and infinitesimal is visible. There we see that the very layer we are is the substance of creation. The ‘awareness energy’ is in itself as the substance of creation. It is non observable or detectable from physical unviverse, as it doesnot interact or is influenced by, or exchanges energy with, or take part in, its creation.
This Awareness energy – we can call it Zhy or call it Mandalini, is the foundation of the theory. Now this is the foundation of our theory, but the philosophical aspects goes beyond it, beyond the awareness energy, but we are not dealing with it, as for us it will suffice to start our theory with the foundation of it as Zhy.
Now to put the theory inbrief, the entire matrix of all fields, the electromagnetic, gravitational, nuclear field, all the fields and types of energies, the space – time continuum, everyhing, all can be concieved on this awareness energy, which we call Zhy. Here we dont have a particle-field concept, rather we have field-particle concept. Fields first, particles next.
Now this awareness energy we are talking from a layer beyond our mind, the layer of Zhy – an intellectual layer. “We dont have to see” these waves or the awareness energy, the defenition and what they are trivial, where as their essense is important. Now, the distribution of all these enegy is highly dynamic as fields and unstable as they are not quantised. The fields are highly unstable, sort of a gigantic matrix and takes time bound statistical resultant postions, as output stability configurations, which form particles/charges like electron. The fields orientation, stability contribution factors, intnsity of their flux, all make difference. In short we can call the fields instantaneous resultant of random unstable dynamic flux.
We can term this as full consciousness, the superimpostion of intellectual and mental imaginative layers. Now, this energy in quantised form is intellect,mind consciousness etc., and that is why we are living things. The phi as it is quantised stable enegy. So it is self intelligible, self thinkable, self imaginable. But the unstable form is the non quantised energy, which is only externally intelligible. That is the matrix from there comes the whole universe. As it is unstable and nonquantised, the universe has the inherent tendency to get back to the stable quantised state – the phi state. Now comes the relatively quantised self intelligible specks – the living things – we see the system of flux, non quantised around, observe, involve. All as self intelligible beings. But in short we and that, the living things and the matrix, all are the same continuum, the phi flux. As our enery is more quantised, we are move more towards stability, we are more phi. This is a possibility that a nonliviving thing can also become living – it is a continuum – no distinction.
All the forces in the universe and the basic building blocks of matter, all of these form part of the resultant matrix of phy system. One will be able to fit gravity, nuclear force, etc in that matrix, as well as the charge we call electron, quarks and other building blocks of this universe. With this all rectilinear motion, inertia, mechanics, all can be explaned by the concept of resultant matrix.
This is when I put a query about youngs double slit experiment. How do we explain the youngs double slit experiment? When a light is passed through a obstacle with 1 slit in it, the result states that light is particle, as there is no diffusion of the light, which would happen if the light is a wave. Now when the obstacle has 2 slits in it, the same light produces a interference pattern. Now scientists have managed to do this with a single photon, and they found the same result. When 1 slit is open, the light behaves as a particle, and when both the slits on the same plane is open, it created a interference pattern. Now does the single photon know if both the slits are open or one is open, and decide whether it has to behave as a particle or a wave?
Using the theory to explain this phenomenon santosh had this explanation. “I think it can be easily explained, but the exact solution and precision of argument will take time [for all phenomenon]. But this question can be coolly answered. it is the other way, a radiation is a feeble, just a few photons discharging., their rectilinear motion is at high speed. To attain the resultant, this is a very effective way on phi plane to attain stability. Radiation, this changes resultants at tremendous speeds. So the presence of any obstruction can easily affect the stability configuration equation tremendously as the particle is so small. Now as a radiation it is stable. It can retain the particle nature . An obstruction, the photon can still retain its particle nature but the successively two obstructions can weaken the intensity of the flux that it no longer remain intensified as a particle and disintegrates as a wave this is the most stable resultant stability equation.
I think I didnt put the question to him correctly, and explained that both the slits are on one plane, they are not successive obstacles, but one obstacle, with two slits or 1 slit as the experimenter might need.
if it can be undersstood that there is nothing like an electron or photon but just an instantaneous node of the resultant flux then we can understand this phenomenon. A photon as a small conglommeration of phi flux is easily disintegrable into successive instantaneous resultant, which makes it move into the most probable paths. Now comes a very startling announcement. It is diff to explain simply. I will try to make an analogy. And also dont think that disintegration means it breaks. It means only that it changes postion. Now u should know one thing, motion in our concept is exactly ceasing to exist at a point and being existant at another. This happens in continuum. This is motion. To be more precise, the instantaneous resultant node position coordiante changes with time. This creates the illusion of a particle. Now, nothing has to know anything. “Everything is a flux contiuum, everything affects – the position – instantaneous – of everything – as it all in continuum makes the attempt to approach stability. So now, when two openings are there, the resultant can be a path which has to be a vibration of points on one line and another alternately, that is. This solution is possible. A particle appearing on one line at a time and on another next, is no wonder if u imagine evry bit of motion is precisely that. Though here the two points are on two lines. But this solution is possible only on very small particles, as there it is more economical than reflection from a surface. In heavy mass reflection from a surface or passing thru a single slit as a unit is more stable solution and that is what we usually experience everynow and then.
Ok, only some of that made sense, but from the discussion the idea I got is as this. When a photon is released and it encounters an obstacle with 1 slit open, the stablest form of the photon (the type of flux that constitutes photon) is the apparent form of particle. Now when the same photon is released and encounters an obstacle with two slits in its path, the maximum stable form that the photon (or that type of flux), is a wave form. Now from this conclusion, If I am right, the stable most version of the photon type of flux is a particle form, and the next stable version for the same type of flux is wave. I need to get this confirmed straight from the horses mouth.
Now there has not been any equations or mathematics to work out or predict the differnt stablity modes of a type of flux. But I believe this can be developed if needed so by Sanotsh with the help of other mathematicians.
Now the question come about time. How do we explain time. The idea of time is explalined like this “What holds the matrix and the other fluxes from phi is time”. The non quantised state to quantised state transtition – thru time – where time is also a non quantised illusory concept in phi, within which is the space within which comes all the particles, enrgy field all. To be clear, the time is basically the extent of unstability in the phi flux. Time as such is nothing but this unstability which makes the whole nonquantised enrgy, space possible. Thus space is unstable energy and time is the unstability. So more the extent of instability, more the time concept or more slower the time is. One can stop time at quantised levels of phi, meaning time stops when stable phi is attained. Space too comes to and end at that state and then all that is too.
Now this entire phi is nothing but a reflection on zero by the higher plane, which cannot be defined or thought. Reflection means not real, beyond this nothing can be thought or any thing – perhaps – no nothing can be even drawn as a small line. We cannot even feel this phi level. Its beyond the intellectual layer, only if deeper layers beyong the intellectual boundfaries open up – when man develops to that, still there can be more layers beyond. The only word that fits it now is NETI (Na iti)
Now this brief preface to the thoery might have thrown open a few questions which can be looked into. Let the discussions begin.